watch Skyfall movie, cinema and tv shows and download Skyfall for free.
Watch free english cinema movies online
Schau kostenlose deutsche Kinofilme online
Watch free french cinema movies online
Watch free spanish cinema movies online
Watch free italian cinema movies online
Watch free japanese cinema movies online
Watch free turkish cinema movies online
Watch free russia cinema movies online
watch Skyfall movie, cinema and tv shows and download Skyfall for free. Movie and Cinema News Home User Registration on movie2k.to Register Forum Forum Frequently Asked Questions FAQ Contact Contact
Search
   
Mirrors

Watch movie

Skyfall  

Skyfall

    Quality: Movie quality TS Line dubbed  
Bond's loyalty to M is tested as her past comes back to haunt her. As MI6 comes under attack, 007 must track down and destroy the threat, no matter how personal the cost.

Download “Skyfall” in HD quality! (720p)


The movie does not play properly? Click here please!


 
IMDB Rating: 7.80 | REPORT AS OFFLINE
Genre: Action , Adventure , Crime , Thriller  | Length: 143 minutes | Land/Year: UK, USA/2012
Director: Sam Mendes  |  Actors: Daniel Craig, Judi Dench, Javier Bardem, Ralph Fiennes, Naomie Harris, Bérénice Marlohe
Release: Skyfall.2012.TS.XViD-UNiQUE


watch free movies online
+ Add a comment for Skyfall

d0peshow

11/08/2012
04:52
well thing is...asswipe copies generate KLICKS and even if you just go in to try out the quality...thats all the fuckheads need you to do.
+14   good comment! bad comment!
>> REPLY
asielblood

01/12/2013
20:19
hahahahahhahahahhahaahahahahhahaha :D hahahahhahahah hahahahhaha hahahaha hah ah hah ha
+1   good comment! bad comment!
 
zigzagoon

01/25/2013
03:06
lmfao
0   good comment! bad comment!
 
tcupp420

04/16/2013
01:08
Sweet
0   good comment! bad comment!
>> REPLY
Tankit

04/14/2013
17:43
Have to say I dont think Daniel Craigs the best bond Id say Sean Connery or piers.
0   good comment! bad comment!
>> REPLY

watch free movies online
StormyKat1

04/08/2013
19:01
omg - all these comments on comments reminds me of the mystery science theater - only not during the show which is nice - on the film - if u like bond - fair enough - i like bond movies and not afraid to say so - i dont expect brilliance - just a good time.
0   good comment! bad comment!
>> REPLY
dinkyboo

03/29/2013
04:28
I enjoyed the movie. i say 8/10 for a bond movie. But I do have to say that daniel craig is one sexy man!
0   good comment! bad comment!
>> REPLY
doosra95

03/24/2013
16:03
Another Shit Bond BOLLOCKS i say !
+1   good comment! bad comment!
>> REPLY
MzHenna21

02/27/2013
03:34
I imagine many became VERY uncomfortable around 74:00 LOL
0   good comment! bad comment!
>> REPLY
aibac

02/19/2013
03:33
i need too finish this movie every time iplay theres a log in the end it keeps on loading
0   good comment! bad comment!
>> REPLY
Kackerat

02/18/2013
07:58
Great Movie...
0   good comment! bad comment!
>> REPLY
dragonpm

02/15/2013
02:38
Thank You for this,I enjoyed it.
0   good comment! bad comment!
>> REPLY
artiemac

02/06/2013
10:19
Ok, this is my second time watching this movie, and I cant believe how many detractors it has! First, it has Javier Bardem as the villain, and as we all saw in "No Country for Old Men" this dude kicks ass as a villain! Second, of course 007 is a super human, can you really think of a bond movie where he was anything less? Perhaps they pushed the envelope a bit with him getting shot twice and falling off of a bridge, but its certainly not impossible for someone to survive that kind of a fall into turbulent waters, and if both shots missed the vital organs, arteries, and major bones (which it kinda shows that both shots were in the shoulder area) than someone could potentially still be able to stagger out of the river and to a hospital. Lets not forget, this guy is supposed to be the baddest mofo from MI6, highly trained, fit, agile, and above all a resourceful survivor, if anyone could do the things done it this movie, it would be someone like that.
+2   good comment! bad comment!
>> REPLY
ronak1211

01/30/2013
18:39
so booringg
0   good comment! bad comment!
>> REPLY
dartagen

01/30/2013
04:26
exactly what i expected... it was good but not mind blowing 7/10
+2   good comment! bad comment!
>> REPLY
QUIRK

01/30/2013
00:40
YAWN!!!!
0   good comment! bad comment!
>> REPLY
bitten2ice

01/28/2013
20:14
biggest pile of sh!t since the last bond film
+2   good comment! bad comment!
>> REPLY
Creasy

01/27/2013
05:37
@ahriman87 Super human..Really :/ All the serving Men
-1   good comment! bad comment!
>> REPLY
Creasy

01/27/2013
05:39
and Women who serve around the world who are shot and survive are then Super human..and falling into water undoubtedly should leed to death..yes these 2 things really do completely ruin the film -_-
-1   good comment! bad comment!
 
Creasy

01/27/2013
02:47
nicely said @Rigante, though they did initally start James Bond Televised with Casino Royale in 1954 after the novel in 1953 it was only 48 minutes long and was actually a live Tv showing rather than a movie, they did not officially start the Movie series until 1962 with Dr. No and in which ended up not being in chronological order. As a Bond fan i can say i still thouroughly enjoy the series and hopefully will continue to do so
-1   good comment! bad comment!
>> REPLY
ahriman87

01/26/2013
14:16
pretty bad 2/10 077 seems like a super human and servies being shot twice and falling of a bridge very crap
-1   good comment! bad comment!
>> REPLY
torgeir

01/25/2013
21:43
It`s the first bond movie where i felt that the villain should have won the game
+2   good comment! bad comment!
>> REPLY
msoblivion

01/25/2013
10:54
was ok
+2   good comment! bad comment!
>> REPLY
wtfzombies

01/23/2013
02:46
I was expecting a bond flic. but as much as I liked it i must say it was the first bond movie where so much of the movie was just talking. Id say it was a great film, I just miss the old bond movies with the gadgets, nonstop shoot outs, and one hot babe after another.
0   good comment! bad comment!
>> REPLY
ebenizzy

11/24/2012
02:04
oh my God i miss the james bond of the 90s..the spy who loved me, die another day...when i was little i watched these movies over and over again not coz i understood anything.. but the cars.. his guns..his suit...the buildings..wristwatches...submarines..an d above all his taste of women...no m is even dead...ill give this move a 3/10 this guyz are just corrupting rogers legacies...they should make their own movies..not use the name james bond. that name is legendary
+3   good comment! bad comment!
>> REPLY
moongazor
>>
-6  
 
PureVodka

11/30/2012
17:06
Roger Moore was in some good ones:-)
0   good comment! bad comment!
 
Rigante

12/22/2012
20:59
These daniel craig bonds are prequels. Did you not listen in casino royale when they said he just earned his 00 status. Its all a bit mixed up but they are prequels to what we all know as bond. I would have thought they dropped enough hints in this film for people to figure this out ayyyyy.
+1   good comment! bad comment!
 
PureVodka

12/26/2012
17:04
@ebenizzy From 1044 critic reviews @IMDb, 110 have give this 1/10* and 40 2/10* alone, which is nearly 15% of the votes, this you do not get on a 8/10* rated film. To the point of this info they are saying (film is hyped up) the same has "you and others" that posted when this was first put up, how does this help me? Hi well look for another film that hi well ~enjoy! p.s. Has you can tell this has been bugging me....;-)
-1   good comment! bad comment!
 
TinoFaygo

01/11/2013
02:55
Actually Rigante any time a new actor takes over a 007 its called a reboot not a prequel. They say in the first Daniel Craig bond movie that when an agent dies a new 007 takes their place and earns the title. Technically this is not a prequel. How could it be? A prequel would have to be set before the 60s they use modern day stuff in the current films. Seriously Rigante you talked down to these people yet you are the moron.
0   good comment! bad comment!
 
Rigante

01/19/2013
11:40
Actually TinoFaygo,you have me confused with someone more ignorant than yourself. Did you think I would post something I didnt know anything about ? Why dont you google IAN FLEMMING and look at which book is actually the first James Bond story in the entire series. I can save you the trouble by informing you it is in fact Casino Royale written in 1953. They did not start the movies in chronological order that is why they did Casino Royale as Daniel Craigs first Bond movie. The first ever james Bond mission. They have already done 99% of the other novels/ movies with other actors playing Bond. Not other agents taking his name. Quantum of Solace is a bit out of whack, as I posted earlier its a bit mixed up. but still it is one of the earlier stories. Skyfall is especially written as a prequel to the other bond films and to reintroduce the original MoneyPenny, Q and M to the new generation. TinaFaygo you have shown yourself to be totally ignorant, abusive and downright wrong. Did you even know that Ian Flemming was the author of James Bond ? Did you think to check your info before calling people names, NO YOU DIDN"T. Also a Reboot is a moderm term to restart your computer lol couldnt resist that one. You could say to do a reboot is to redo or re envision an older/ another version, for example; Total recall. Not when you hire another actor, OMG. There can be no arguement that Casino Royale is the First James Bond novel written, therefore its a prequel to all the other James Bonds we grew up with. I was actually explaining to ebenizzy why there was no subs or flash gadgets etc. Not talking down to everyone as you put it. I wouldnt normally bother with an ignoramous like yourself but sometimes education is the only alternative, YOU HAVE BEEN SERVED, now where is your comeback ? Sorry everyone backhander complete.
+1   good comment! bad comment!
 
shankkings

01/19/2013
06:21
this left the triditional james bond movie feel in total but was still a dam good movie I actually liked everything but the name I would rename it "to the ends of the world" cause the villain was kick ass and die hard the one pet peeve was not many gadgets for a bond flick none the less I would give it easy 8.6 if it were not a bond movie 8.8
0   good comment! bad comment!
>> REPLY
Lilyrox

01/17/2013
20:36
Wow this movie was exellent! The quality was a bit rough. Im not a big James Bond fan but this totally changed my mind! movie 9/10
+1   good comment! bad comment!
>> REPLY
asielblood

01/12/2013
20:18
didnt much liked this james bond i expected a lot more gadgets it this film like the computer said"what were u expecting an exploding pen" my ANSWER IS yes i expect those thing its 007 that like mission impossible with a different name but overall the quality was good the climax was good ....AND DAMN HE ALWAYS GET THE GIRLS i love that lol
+1   good comment! bad comment!
>> REPLY
khaledj

01/06/2013
23:57
Didnt like the fact that M is dead... We got used to her :(
+1   good comment! bad comment!
>> REPLY
khaledj

01/06/2013
23:55
10/10 Audio-Video quality.. Not a great 007 movie as the usual... but still watchable ... thanks :)
+1   good comment! bad comment!
>> REPLY
albiansin

01/06/2013
18:38
Nice movie but I hated the granny that have the role of the boss , ists fuckink to ridiculouse.
+1   good comment! bad comment!
>> REPLY
omerkhan18

01/05/2013
22:43
nise move
0   good comment! bad comment!
>> REPLY
wolfgemini

01/05/2013
12:53
mediocre movie its not really a bond movie,just some fable tales or like a romeo juliet movie........ bond movie is all about gadgets action technology... those kind of bond movies are over finished game over...
-1   good comment! bad comment!
>> REPLY
Nausicaa

01/04/2013
19:22
Completely ridiculous plot which can be masked by bells and whistles at times. First 40 minutes are fine. Then theres just plot hole after plot hole. If only all the villains were this stupid, Jimmy would be grand.
-2   good comment! bad comment!
>> REPLY


>> NEXT COMMENT PAGE >>